The analysis reveals that the proline-rich regions P1–P2 and the four pseudo-repeats contribute to the Tau/F-actin interaction
The combined data—(i) competition of binding of Tau to F-actin by cofilin, which interacts with actin’s hydrophobic pocket, and (ii) residue-specific PRE effects in the repeat domain of Tau by preferential MTSSL-labeling of C374 in proximity to the hydrophobic pocket—suggest that Tau binds to the solvent-exposed hydrophobic pocket that is located between subdomains 1 and 3 of actin
Truncation of Tau by caspases and endopeptidases has been suggested to constitute an important pathogenic step in AD
Addition of an equimolar concentration of Tau caused bundling of F-actin (Fig. 1b), although some single filaments remained
Quantification of the intensity of different bands indicated that ~63% of Tau remained in the supernatant. In addition, ~8% of Tau molecules were bound to single filaments, while ~29% of Tau was found together with actin bundles. The data demonstrate that Tau bundles actin filaments
In addition, K18 was capable of bundling F-actin (Supplementary Fig. 5b)
Sequential resonance assignment of the peptide (Supplementary Table 3), followed by NOE analysis (Supplementary Fig. 13) and structure calculations (Supplementary Fig. 14) showed that the short peptide folds into an α-helix (residues 259–265) in complex with F-actin that is similar to the one found in Tau(254–290) (Supplementary Fig. 14b)
In contrast to Tau(254–290), however, Tau(254–268) was not able to bundle F-actin (Supplementary Fig. 5d)
To gain insight into the structure, which these segments adopt in complex with F-actin, we used the peptide Tau(254–290), which bundles filaments (Fig. 3a)
When compared to the wild-type peptide, Tau(254–290)-L266E showed a decreased STD signal (Supplementary Figure 10c–e), indicating that the mutation attenuated F-actin binding
In contrast, medium-range NOE cross-peaks, which are specific for secondary structure, were observed for residues ~260 to ~268 and residues ~277 to ~283
The analysis suggests that the experimental NOE data witness the formation of helical structure in these regions upon binding to F-actin, but the number of detected restraints is not sufficient to define a unique conformation
In some of the other conformers of Tau (254–290), however, residues 261–265 were identified not as α- helix but as 3–10 helix, while residues 277–283 were assigned to α-helix
Analysis of secondary structure in the lowest energy conformation using STRIDE47, identifies α-helix for residues 261–268 and 3–10 helix for residues 277–280
Tau(292–319) comprises the residues of repeat R2 and R3, which experience strong signal attenuation upon addition of F-actin to full-length Tau (Fig. 1e, f). In agreement with the ability of Tau(292–319) to bind to F-actin, the peptide promotes bundling of actin filaments (Supplementary Fig. 5c)
One of these binding partners is cofilin, a 21 kDa eukaryotic protein, which binds to F-actin with a Kd < 0.05 μM33 and results in disassembly of F-actin34, 35. Cryo-electron microscopy further showed that the binding site of cofilin on F-actin is highly similar to its binding site on G-actin (Fig. 2a)32
In most structures a 3–10 helix was identified for residues 315–318, although in the lowest energy structure residues 315–318 are in α-helical conformation (Supplementary Figure 12c)
The NMR experiments demonstrate that MARK2- phosphorylation of Tau attenuates its binding to F-actin. Consistent with a reduced affinity, MARK2-phosphorylated Tau failed in bundling actin filaments (Fig. 4e)
In addition, attachment of a phosphate group to S262 in the peptide Tau (254–284) decreased the affinity of the peptide for F-actin (Supplementary Fig. 1) and lowered the amount of Tau (254–284)-promoted actin bundles (Fig. 4f)
In agreement with a decrease in affinity of Tau(254–290)-L266E for binding to F-actin (Supplementary Fig. 1), the mutant peptide was less efficient in promoting F-actin bundling (Supplementary Fig. 10f)
An important class of kinases that phosphorylate Tau at S262 and the other KXGS motifs in the repeat domain are the microtubule-associated protein/microtubule affinity-regulating kinases (MARKs)
We therefore phosphorylated full-length Tau by MARK2. The downfield chemical shift of phosphorylated residues (Fig. 4a) is in agreement with previous reports and confirms phosphorylation at S262, S293, S305, S324, S356, and S416
BEL Commons is developed and maintained in an academic capacity by Charles Tapley Hoyt and Daniel Domingo-Fernández at the Fraunhofer SCAI Department of Bioinformatics with support from the IMI project, AETIONOMY. It is built on top of PyBEL, an open source project. Please feel free to contact us here to give us feedback or report any issues. Also, see our Publishing Notes and Data Protection information.
If you find BEL Commons useful in your work, please consider citing: Hoyt, C. T., Domingo-Fernández, D., & Hofmann-Apitius, M. (2018). BEL Commons: an environment for exploration and analysis of networks encoded in Biological Expression Language. Database, 2018(3), 1–11.